except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 15:00 on April 23, 2019, the Defendant: (a) visited the said restaurant at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in Goyang-gu, Soyang-gu; (b) ordered the victim to drink, and (c) obstructed the victim’s duties by force during four hours of operation by force, such as: (a) directly taking the alcohol in the cooling house and drinking it to the victim; (b) continuously gathering the alcohol on the part of the victim; (c) gathering tobacco but gathering the cigarette on the restaurant floor after smoking; and (d) having other customers come out of the restaurant; and (c) having other customers go out of the restaurant; and (d) having other customers unable to enter the restaurant by taking the front of the entrance; and (d) interfere with the victim’s duties by force.

2. 피고인은 2019. 4. 25. 12:30경 제1항 기재 장소에서, 만취한 상태로 위 식당을 찾아가 피해자 C에게 ‘씹할 년아 술이나 줘’라고 욕설을 하면서 테이블을 발로 걷어차고, 피해자를 따라 주방 안으로 들어 가 ‘야, 씹할 술 달라니까 왜 안줘’라고 소리를 지르고, 옆 테이블에 앉아 있던 손님에게 ‘씹할 년아 뭘 쳐다봐 ’라고 욕설을 하는 등 약 20분간 위력으로 피해자의 식당 운영 업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (F testimonys by the victim and hearing statements by the victim);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "justifiable circumstances") of the suspended sentence;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one to seven years;

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Each type of interference with business;