For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted each of the facts charged of obtaining a third party bribe related to C and violation of X-related attorney-at-law’s law.

Examining the record and evidence, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the abuse of power of prosecution or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the abuse of power of prosecution, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Meanwhile, the Defendant appealed to the remaining guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, but the Defendant did not state the grounds for appeal and did not state the grounds for appeal in the notice of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.