대여금
1. The defendant's 62,00,000 won and its 36% per annum from January 1, 2004 to June 29, 2007 and June 30, 2007 to the plaintiff. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20190, Jun. 30, 2007>
In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff can recognize the fact that the plaintiff extended the amount of KRW 62 million to the defendant on August 20, 2003 with interest rate of KRW 30,000,000,000 on September 30, 2003; and the remaining amount of KRW 32,00,000 on December 31, 200.
According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 62 million won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 36% per annum, which is the agreed interest rate, from January 1, 2004 to June 29, 2007, and from June 30, 2007 to the date of full payment, to the extent prescribed by the Interest Limitation Act.
Although the defendant asserts that the actual amount of debt against the plaintiff is KRW 33,494,485, the defendant's assertion that the actual amount of debt against the plaintiff is KRW 33,494,485, the above assertion by the defendant is not sufficient to acknowledge it only with the descriptions of evidence Nos.
If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.