2. Although the defendant acknowledges the facts of the crime and reflects the fact of the crime, and some damaged goods are deemed to be returned to or delivered to the victims, the defendant committed several crimes for a short period of time and the total sum of the damaged amount is not sufficient, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period due to the previous and previous crimes, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period. In light of the criminal records of the defendant, the risk of repeating the crime seems to be high, considering various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's argument does not have merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.