마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, etc.) to the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.
2. The defendant recognized the entirety of the crimes of this case and repented the error in depth.
In addition, the defendant has no record of punishment.
However, the Defendant repeatedly purchased and smoked marijuana.
In addition, the crimes such as the cycle of linking the hemp seller to X who is an accomplice are not weak.
Since narcotics, including marijuana, are highly harmful to individuals and society as well as individuals due to their halluity, toxicity, etc., it is necessary to punish them strictly.
In full view of these circumstances, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant pleadings, it is difficult to deem that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.
Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.