Any person who intends to operate a farm for the diversion of farmland shall obtain permission from the competent authorities.

In addition, a person who intends to engage in land seawater fisheries shall obtain permission from the competent authority for each fishing vessel, fishing gear, or facility.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent authorities around April 28, 2017, carried out a new fish farming business with approximately 1.4 million white bridges in the total area of 41,759 square meters in 20 square meters in the area of 10,759 square meters in order to a new fish farming place, installed a sea water for a new fish farming, and installed an air circulating machine, etc., and run a new fish farming business.

Accordingly, the defendant has diverted farmland without obtaining permission and carried out land seawater fisheries without obtaining permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports (the current status of farms in which the number of permitted inland injuries is two and field verification);

1. Article 57 (2) and Article 34 (1) of the Farmland Act concerning the facts constituting the relevant crime; Article 97 (1) 2 and Article 41 (3) 2 of the Act concerning the fisheries;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The reasons for sentencing alternative to imprisonment with prison labor are the same as those of the defendant, and the defendant repeats again during the period of suspension of execution, on the other hand, considering the defendant's age, sex, family relation, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., as a whole, various circumstances revealed in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, family relation, circumstances after the crime, etc., as stated in the text.