폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(상습폭행)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On December 2006, the Defendant assaulted the victim without any particular reason for the reason that the victim was a her migrant woman, who was a couple of international marriage around the end of 33 years of age, and the name of Vietnam.
1. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual assault) around 23:00 on December 12, 2006, the Defendant habitually abused the victim 15 times until April 10, 2013, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form of crime, on the ground that the Defendant did not attend the meeting of the husband and wife of the company in which the Defendant is employed and the Defendant did not have the victim attend the meeting at the same time, and on the ground that there was a traffic accident during which the Defendant was married, the Defendant did not take part in the meeting of the husband and wife of the company in which the Defendant was married.
2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;
A. At around 20:30 on April 28, 2013, the Defendant habitually responded to the victim, who was suffering from the Defendant’s assault, “at night anywhere at night,” but, on the ground that the victim respondeded to the victim, who was suffering from the Defendant’s assault, “at soup at soup, shot, softened, softened, softened in soften,” “the thickness to make the victim unsatisfed in softened in soften,” and the victim’s head and head were flicked by hand and flicked the victim’s head and flicked the victim’s head, etc. by hand.
As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump around the
B. At around 08:00 on May 3, 2013, the Defendant requested the victim to have the key of the vehicle in the K apartment underground parking lot as indicated in the preceding paragraph, but on the ground that the victim was refused to have the key of the vehicle in operation.