1. At around 04:50 on July 12, 2017, Defendant 2017, Defendant 1530, on the front side of “D convenience store” located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongju-si, without any justifiable reason, she walked a Si fee to the victim E (19 tax) who was walking in the mobile phone call, and received a claim from the injured party, Defendant 1530, on the face of the injured party on the face of the victim on a one-time basis, suffered injury on the face of the victim on the face of the victim on a one-time basis.

2. On July 7, 2017, Defendant 2017, Defendant 1859, while drinking alcohol in front of “G” located in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, around 19:58 on July 7, 2017, Defendant 1 assaulted Ha and the victim I (18 years of age) of the disease on the floor without any reason, and Ha and the victim I (18 years of age) of the disease for the safety of pedestrians.

3. 2018 high group 114

A. Special intimidation Defendant: (a) around August 19, 2017, at around 02:05, Cheongju-si operated by the Victim K (V, 60 years of age) in a restaurant operated by Cheongju-si, a considerable amount of J (V, and (b) the Defendant took kimchi, and (c) the victim does not speak.

In the process of hinginging the victim of the defect, the body of the victim, who is a dangerous object at the same place, was collected, acting as the victim was frighten, and threatened the victim with the same attitude.

B. The Defendant followed the said K, intending to keep the place at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph (a) above, and assaulted the victim L (30 years) who was a restaurant customer, with the Defendant’s selling of the victim of the defect about to see this Defendant once.

4. At around October 27, 2017, Defendant 391, the Cheongju-si, the main point of the “O” in the operation of the Victim N in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-si, Cheongju-si, issued an order of So-ju 3 Cick and Ho-kin 1ma as if he would normally pay the price despite having no intent or ability to pay the price even if the victim received alcoholic beverages, etc., and then, Defendant 2 was provided with alcoholic beverages worth KRW 24,00 in total from the victims.

In this respect.