beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.16 2015구합69370

손실보상금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 247,567,100 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from April 22, 2015 to February 16, 2017.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

A. Project approval and public notice 1) A public housing project (hereinafter “instant project”).

2) A public announcement of project approval: The defendant: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 2010-315, Oct. 14, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 2584, Oct. 3, 2014>

B. Land subject to expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal on February 26, 2015: Each land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each land of this case”) shall be classified as “each land of this case” and “the land of this case” according to the sequence of specific cities.

(2) Compensation for losses: The content of the judgment on the amount of compensation for expropriation (3,877,476,900 won in total) stated in the separate sheet No. 1: The Plaintiff’s assertion that the compensation is different from the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff’s compensation is made in the previous state, which is not “forest,” which is a land category registered on the public register. The date of expropriation (4) on April 21, 2015, on the ground that it is confirmed that a part of the instant land is being used as a pre-use of 245.5m2, which is not a land cultivated, but is confirmed as a forest in which the two-class businesses are engaged in the two-class business, not a land cultivated at present: An appraisal corporation unification and the Korea Appraisal Corporation;

C. Details of adjudication by the Central Land Tribunal on September 17, 2015: The amount of compensation for each of the instant lands shall be increased to KRW 3,970,851,400 in total, and the Plaintiff’s assertion that the amount of compensation for losses shall be increased to KRW 3,970,851,400 in the attached Table 1, and the Plaintiff’s assertion that the compensation for losses shall be made in the same manner as the current state, which is not “forest,” a land category registered on the public register, shall be rejected for the same reasons as the contents of the adjudication of expropriation. 2) An appraisal corporation: Gyeongil appraisal corporation, Inc., Ltd., and 【Appraisal appraisal corporation, 【No ground for recognition’, Party A’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, B, 1, 2

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The instant case ① through (4) is excluded from the land (attached Form 1 No. 1 attached hereto; hereinafter “instant sports site”).

2) The Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as "the Republic of Korea") shall be the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea.