A. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unhued and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment of the public prosecutor and the defendant's arguments together with other accomplices. The crime of this case was committed in collusion with other accomplices and provided them to the crime of this case by transferring various access media connected to the financial account under the name of another co-offenders to the crime of this case. Such crime was committed in collusion with 70 victims and posted on the Internet page of the country from around June 2014 to September 2014, and by deceiving them as if they sold the goods, and it was paid with the money equivalent to 105,890,00 won in total as the price for the goods. In consideration of the frequency of crime, method of crime, planning and organization of crime, multiple victims, and fraud amount, etc., it is not good that the crime of this case was committed, and the defendant did not receive a considerable amount of punishment for the same kind of crime of this case, including the crime of this case, since it did not harm the credibility of the safety of the Internet trade and caused serious harm to society as well as it did not necessarily have to be recovered from a considerable social and unspecified punishment.