However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 20, 2012, at around 21:40 on August 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the victim D (here, 47 years of age) as the husband E and the Buddhist person of the Defendant’s husband; and (b) was aware of the victim’s her husband E and the Buddhist person; (c) caused the victim to inflict an injury on the victim, such as a blue blue blue, blue in the left part of the victim’s loss, due to the hacker, which is a dangerous thing cited in the hack hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. 쇠 photographs used by the suspect;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The foregoing circumstances and considering the fact that the defendant has no criminal records of probation or heavier);