except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 재물손괴 피고인은 2014. 11. 10. 17:05경 안산시 단원구 B에 있는 C식당 앞 노상에서 피고인이 소란을 피운다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 안산단원경찰서 소속 순경 D으로부터 귀가를 종용받자 화가 나 위 D에게 “젊은 새끼가 왜 지랄이야, 씨발 새끼야 이 좃만한 새끼야, 또라이 개새끼야”라고 욕설을 하며 피해자 E가 운영하는 위 C식당으로 들어가 피해자 소유인 시가 미상의 나무의자를 가지고 나온 뒤 바닥에 집어던져 의자다리가 부러지게 함으로써 재물을 손괴하였다.

2. Performance of official duties;

A. On November 17:08, 201, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender with the crime referred to in paragraph (1) and served as a police box of the Ansan-gu Police Station; and (b) obstructed the legitimate performance of public duties in relation to the escort of a police officer by assaulting the police officer, such as: (c) “Iskin, kin, kin, and kin,” and “Iskin, Iskin, and kin in the front of the Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, annsan-si, annsan-si, 50 walling apartment.”

B. In order to investigate the crimes as referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this Article, the Defendant: (a) was arrested at the patrol police station; and (b) was escorted to the criminal department and office of the Ansan Police Station at the F Police Station; and (c) took place on November 17:20, 2014, the Defendant committed assault against the police officer D, such as “a son, kin, and knovas” and selling the knovas part at one time the head of the police station, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the escort of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement regarding D;

1. Each statement of E, G and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of destruction, and photographs on the inside of victims;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalty;