If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On April 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports from “C” located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul; and (b) received such reports, and the police officers affiliated with Mapo-gu Police Station Dental Team reported that the Defendant filed a defect in seeking to hear the statement of damage from the reporting person.

The argument is based on “the internal price.”

A declaration was also made.

The daily treatment shall be made equally.

Do alternative Do 2 Do Do 20

The police officer avoided the disturbance by pointing the disturbance, and the police officer requested to see the witness's statement after diving and see the witness's statement, leaving the reporter's front in order to move to another place, cutting the clothes, cutting down the left upper part of the cream, cutting the cream, and continuing to do so. The police officer kept the crison the left part of the cream and shoulder of the cream, turning the crison on the right side of the cream and the shoulder of the crison of the crison.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to E, F, and G, and to scambal photographs of the police officers in mobilization;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the selection of fines for each crime (the fact that the crime is recognized, there is no record of punishment for the same crime except for those punishable by interference with the performance of official duties in around 1990, and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment in addition to those sentenced to a fine once for the crime of injury after around 200)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;