2. Considering the following circumstances, the lower court’s punishment is appropriate in view of the following: (a) the Defendant had been sentenced to suspended sentence due to violence committed in several times in 2007 and 2010; (b) the Defendant was indicted on February 11, 2014 due to the act of interference with business on January 17, 201; and (c) the Defendant was committed by fraud and obstruction of performance of official duties on March 20, 2014; (d) the Defendant was committed against the Defendant’s living under detention; and (e) the Defendant was committed against the victim of the crime of interference with business and fraud at the investigation stage; and (e) the Defendant was committed against the victim of the crime of interference with business and the agreement with the victims of fraud.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.