1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment of KRW 1.5 million (a fine of KRW 1.5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflected, and that the defendant endeavored to recover damage, such as paying KRW 5 million to E around September 2014, while the court below seems to have considered the above circumstances favorable to the defendant. On the other hand, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered newly after the decision of the court below, E, etc. did not reach an agreement with employees, and other various sentencing conditions in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, etc., are not recognized to be unfair because the sentence of the court below is too too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.