Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. On June 17, 2015, around 23:30 on June 17, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business operation by force over about 10 minutes, such as the victim’s “E” operated by the victim D in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul, and the marbling of the marbrity and the marbrance of the marcing of the marc, the marcing of the marc, and the marcing of the marc, the marc of the marc, and the marc of the marc.

2. The Defendant damaged the property equivalent to KRW 96,90,00 in Do, by making the chair and the signboard, which were located at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph (1), fall short of the upper board, and making the screen of the signboard left away.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part concerning D's statement in the witness examination protocol of this court concerning D's witness examination

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (influence No. 10, 11 of investigation records);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;