When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant refers to and resides in a domicile.

As a matter of course, the Defendant has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of danger, such as: (a) the Defendant, as an opening person, is likely to ask a person who satisfys the dog that he raises; and (b) the Defendant has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of danger, such as frequently managing the dog so as to prevent the satisfying; or (c) closing the gate.

Nevertheless, at around 8:00 on May 20, 2013 due to negligence, the Defendant neglected to do so, asked the victim D (e.g., age 52)’s right edges, which was bound by the Hadong-gun Cgate, to ask the female to the right edges of the victim D (e.g., age 52) who was bound by the Hadong-gun Cgate, and caused the female to suffer an injury, such as an open top, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. A written confirmation of hospitalization and a medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as to the attachment of photographs of damaged parts);

1. Relevant Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;