beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.09.27 2011고단3563

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and eight months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of occupational breach of trust is acquitted.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 20, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court on December 20, 2006, and was released from prison to a special amnesty on August 14, 2008, and the term of imprisonment expired on October 23, 2008.

[201Kadan3563] Although the Defendant had a debt equivalent to KRW 200 million in around 2002, the Defendant was deemed to have been able to obtain new authorization from 7 persons under the pretext of investment in sound records and film production businesses between around 2004 and around 2005, the Defendant was bound to acquire KRW 500 million from 7 persons under the pretext of investment in the sound records and film production business and completed the life. After the completion of the life, the Defendant resumed the production of sound records by borrowing companies in the form of an entertainment company, even though he had been instructed to demand repayment of the previous obligation, but the Defendant was also liable for a debt of KRW 300 million or more due to the failure. From the end of December 2009, the Defendant’s mother was to operate an IT company with the knowledge that the Defendant’s mother was operating the specialized driving school in Gangnam-gu D (E) from her mother, and Defendant was able to obtain money from her lender by acquiring the money from her lender.

Therefore, the Defendant, at the Sungnam-si Branch Hospital in April 2010, issued a demand notice to repay the above amount of 300 million won or more at the time, and thus, even if the Defendant borrowed money, there was money to be used in paying the debt, and to raise the cost of hospitalization for the Defendant’s “the producer to pay the amount to be used in connection with the production of the satise satise satis” to the Defendant. However, if the Defendant borrowed the satise 10 million won and borrowed the satise satise 10 million won, the Defendant would discharge the satise satise two times from the victim.