beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.07.03 2014고단3254

무고

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 21, 2014, the Defendant made a false complaint at the law firm office located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and C had C prepare a false complaint for the purpose of having criminal punishment imposed.

The petition of the complaint "A, the defendant, was present in the court No. 10 of the Speaker's District Court No. 2013da48098 and made a false statement contrary to memory in making an oath and testimony as a witness in respect of the loan case No. 2013da48.

2) Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) did not have any contact with D as described in C;

"Representative C" means a witness C, hereinafter the same shall apply.

the Plaintiff and the Defendant met three times a week as above, and three witnesses and three witnesses for one of them are met at the same time.

(2) Although there was no fact that the Plaintiff did not have met D, as in C, and that the Plaintiff would bear the expenses incurred in connection with the income of KRW 10 million per month, the Defendant’s agent’s “the witness did not call that the Plaintiff would bear the expenses incurred in connection with the income of KRW 10 million per month from the place where the Plaintiff and Defendant three persons exist, and that there was no fact that the Defendant’s agent stated that the Plaintiff would bear the entire expenses incurred in connection with the income of KRW 10 million per month.

I asked the question, “I asked this question.”

3. The witness of the defendant's agent did not have any improper relationship with D to the extent that there was no direct witness to the extent that the plaintiff and the defendant had any improper relationship between D and D on two occasions.

The term "to answer" and "to be seen in the underground parking lot of Tae Young apartment".

4. The witness of the Defendant’s agent, on May 11, 2007, did not have any fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendant together met in the Jung-gu F E restaurant, Jung-gu, Seoul, inasmuch as the Plaintiff had not met D as C, at the restaurant of “E”.

A false testimony is made to "to answer questions", and 5. The fact is made to D by the plaintiff.