beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.01 2015나12901

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) 3rd 3rd tier of the judgment of the court of first instance is to be modified as "vehicles"; and (b) 3rd tier of the "Special Drawing Equipment" (from 4, 12 to 5th tier of the judgment of the court of first instance) is the same as the part concerning the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance other than using the 4, 12 to 5th tier of the judgment as follows; (b) as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, if goods are damaged due to illegal acts of this case; (c) if repair is impossible, the reduced value of the 1,3rd tier of the vehicle should be deemed to be ordinary damages; (d) in the event that the cost of repair or restoration to original state considerably exceeds the value of the vehicle to be exchanged due to an accident of this case, the cost of repair or alteration to original state shall be deemed to be the cost of repair in general in terms of the Plaintiff 19-4, unless there are special circumstances.

. is economical;