난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. During the process of the disposition, the Plaintiff’s non-professional employment (E-9) in employment (E-9) (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on March 24, 201 of the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Democratic Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea: (a) on January 15, 2016, the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (b) on March 30, 2016, there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition of refugee non-recognition: (c) the fact that there is no ground for recognition of rejection of the decision of the Supreme Court of Korea on December 22, 2016 of the date of application for objection, as of May 3, 2016; (d) the statements in subparagraphs 1, 2, and 3, B, and 2; and (e)
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a person of nationality of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the Republic of Korea”) from the Republic of Korea.
In four arms, JTM (JTM) is an organization of JTM (JTM Terrik Teri Muti Morcha).
However, with the knowledge that the Plaintiff was engaged in economic activities in the Republic of Korea, the said organization requested the Plaintiff’s family members in Egypt to receive donations from 2015, and the Plaintiff’s family members refused the said demand, thereby threatening the Plaintiff’s family members to commit assault and die, around December 2015.
As such, since the Plaintiff’s return to the four arms is likely to be detrimental to gambling, the Plaintiff ought to be recognized as a refugee.
B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “any foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” In full view of the following circumstances revealed by adding up the whole arguments in the items of evidence Nos. 3, 6, and 7, and evidence Nos. 2 and evidence No. 3, 6, and 7, the Plaintiff is a race, religion, nationality, and nationality.