A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for each of the defendants B and D, for eight months, for each of the defendants C and E, for six months, and for defendant F.

1. Defendant A, B, C, D, and E’s fraud B, C, D, E, andO (hereinafter “Defendant B”) established a P Research Council for the purpose of B B, D, E, and Defendant B is the representative of the pertinent Research Council, and Defendant A is the representative of Q for the purpose of construction business.

Defendant

A, upon receiving a contract for the installation of a production-based facility from Defendant B, etc., a farmer affiliated with the pertinent Research Council under the name of the limited company R, once the Defendant B, etc. paid the cost of the construction, and Defendant A received subsidies from the pregnant group and returned it to Defendant B, etc., by stating the construction cost in excess of the actual cost.

Accordingly, around May 18, 201, Defendant B, etc. applied for subsidies of KRW 372,957,900, which is 70% of the total project cost of the S “S” project to the victim’s room-gun, and applied for payment of KRW 159,839,100, which is the remainder 30% of the total project cost, as the one’s own charge, and calculated the construction cost of the “B Blue Facilities” under the name of KRW 60,70, 305, 40, 60, 60, 70, 70, 305, 60, 60, 60, 60, 60, 70, 705, 306, 705, 206, 705, 205, 60, 705, 60, 705, 205, 207, 306, 705, 25,

As a result, Defendant A, C, D, and E were provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion with O.

2. A constructor who violates the Framework Act on the Construction Industry of the defendant A or F shall do so to another person.