However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 6. 24. 01:47경 문경시 흥덕5길 28-3에 있는 ‘성덕하이빌 5차’ 옆 놀이터에서, 술에 취하여 휴대전화로 음악을 크게 틀어놓고 술을 마시던 중, ‘소음으로 인해 잠을 잘 수가 없다’는 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 문경경찰서 B파출소 소속 경사인 C으로부터 음악 소리를 줄이고 귀가를 해 달라는 요청을 받자 화가 나, 위 C에게 “야이 씨발놈들아. 우리가 뭘 잘못했는데 지랄이야 개새끼들아.”라고 욕설을 하면서 손으로 위 C의 가슴을 7회 밀치고, 이마로 위 C의 얼굴을 3회 들이받고, 손가락으로 눈을 찌를 듯이 위협하는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to C the first and second police statement (the investigative record No. 13, 36 pages);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties [decision of sentence] [Judgment of sentence] The defendant has no criminal record due to violence for about 20 years, and the defendant has a depth of the defendant's mistake, and the defendant's age, character and behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be considered and sentenced as the order.