The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the facts charged in the instant case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “business owner” under Article 29(3) of the former Industrial Safety and Health Act (amended by Act No. 14788, Apr. 18, 2017).

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.