If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant, around 17:25 on June 5, 2012, committed a theft by citing one cell phone (EL) equivalent to 500,000 won at the market price of the victim’s possession where the victim E was in a cabter, where he was in a cabter, located within the Domoter located in C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the site of the case and photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Consideration of the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects the wrongness, and that the damaged goods are recovered and there is no substantial damage.