2. The following facts are favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant led to the confession and rebuttal of each of the instant crimes; (b) the Defendant was not subject to the punishment of the Defendant under the agreement with D, the victim of special intimidation; (c) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes with contingency under the influence of alcohol; and (d) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a period of one year and six months at Suwon District Court on June 13, 2006 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on Punishment of Violence, etc. (a deadly Weapons, etc.) at the Suwon District Court, which

However, the defendant threatened the victim D, a mountain member first at a mountain conference meeting, with a beer ker ker ker ker ker kerife the victim's ker ker kerbs, and interfere with the performance of official duties by displaying beer ker ker ker kere to two police officers dispatched after receiving a report, and the crime is not good in light of the circumstances, contents, results, etc. of each of the crimes of this case, and the defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case despite the previous criminal records; the defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case; the defendant did not agree with two police officers who are victims of special obstruction of performance of official duties and special obstruction of performance of official duties; and the court below's sentencing cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion imposed by comprehensively considering all the sentencing conditions of this case, and the sentence of this case cannot be deemed to have been unfair if the punishment of this case is too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as there is no ground for appeal.