However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 17, 2020, from around 05:40 to 05:50 on the same day, the Defendant thought that the Defendant her wife, while drinking alcohol in the “Dcafeteria” operated by the victim C in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, she would have her crepitate, and her crepit, followed a simplified table, added a stone at that place, and returned to the above restaurant, and caused customers who were in the above restaurant to go up.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of CCTV-cape Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. On the grounds of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the following conditions of sentencing shall be comprehensively taken into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

The crime of this case is committed in a manner that is favorable to the nature of the crime in light of the circumstances leading up to the crime, method of the crime, etc., and the fact that the crime of this case is committed in a manner that is contrary to the degree of depth.