beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.12.16 2016고정358

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)

Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendants are the labor union members affiliated with the metal labor union and the Faembing Association affiliated with the ASEAN branch.

The Defendants installed CCTV in the Victim Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) in F to prevent illegal occupation of factories by the members of the Nowon-gu, to maintain the safety and security of facilities in the factory, and to prevent the violence accidents between the members of the Nowon-gu, etc., with the intent to keep the CCTV from being taken on-site by attaching tapes to the CCTV.

피고인들은 2013. 11. 18. 10:50경 아산시 G에 있는 피해자 회사 검사과 현장에서 피켓을 들고 구호 및 파업가를 제창하며 집회를 하던 중, 피고인 B은 집회현장에서 사회를 보며 “지금 CCTV 다 가려놨던게 다시 또 몇 군데 있네요. 이거는 명백한 조합원들을 감시하는 그런 수단으로 밖에 보이지 않습니다”라고 말하며 조합원들을 선동하고, 피고인 C는 “우리가 카메라에 붙여놨던 테이프를 또 뗐습니다”라고 말하며 오른손에 쥐고 있는 테이프를 피고인 A, 피고인 D에게 나누어 주고, 피고인 A, 피고인 D은 피해자 회사 소유의 시가 25만원 상당의 CCTV 1대에 테이프를 붙였다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly destroyed the CCTV by impairing the original availability of CCTV, such as field photographing, by attaching tapes, thereby impairing the utility of CCTV.

2. As indicated in the facts charged, the Defendants are fully aware of the fact that the tape is attached to the CCTV installed in the victim inspection and the office (hereinafter “the CCTV”).

However, in light of the following circumstances, it is reasonable to view that the Defendants’ act is a justifiable act that does not violate the social norms and the illegality is excluded.

(1) A victim company shall exercise violence against a public prosecutor and a chief of the ASEAN, interfere with his/her duties, or belong to other labor union members.