However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at around 19:00 on May 13, 2017, in the “C cafeteria” located in B at LAW around May 13, 2017, on the ground that the Defendant, while drinking the victim D (24 tax) and alcohol, did not drink the victim’s alcohol.

C. “Sick sick” means “Sicked, which is a dangerous object on the mebble, so that the victim’s face was shicked once, and the victim’s face was 5 times per week.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and carried them with an eye around the snow where the number of days of treatment can not be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Recording notes;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by victims;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the risk of the instant crime, and the victim’s damage at the time of the instant case, are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, in consideration of the fact that the injured person does not want the punishment of the accused and the accused has no criminal record of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment, punishment to prevent recidivism shall be determined.