2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) 51,850,000;

A. The Plaintiff’s reasoning of holding each of the instant stores 1) The entry of the part of “stock company” is omitted from the second entry in the case of the Nam Heung Construction Co., Ltd.

(2) On April 2, 2008, the Dong New Development Co., Ltd. and the Dong New Development Co., Ltd., Ltd., on the ground of three lots of ground D buildings outside Busan Northern-gu, Busan, and three lots of land (hereinafter

Each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant stores”) among the real estate listed in the separate sheet, and individually “1 to 11 stores.”

(2) On June 15, 2010, 1/2010, 1/2 shares of co-owners were registered and 1/2 shares were registered. On the same day, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in respect of the remaining stores except for the 4 and 5 stores among each of the instant stores, and 1/2 shares of Co-owners was completed on July 27, 2012, flus Co., Ltd. on August 23, 2012, flusian Construction completed the registration of ownership transfer on the whole shares of Co-owners on each of the instant stores.

3) On September 11, 2013, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer for the remaining stores except for the 4 and 5 stores among the instant stores on September 11, 2013 (the Plaintiff did not complete the registration of ownership transfer for the 4 and 5 stores) on September 11, 2013 (the Plaintiff did not have completed the registration of ownership transfer for the 5 stores). However, there is no dispute between the parties that the Plaintiff, the purchaser of each of the said stores, transferred the status of the flusium and the flusium for the flusium, and owned each of

B. B. The Defendant’s possession and use of each of the instant stores 1) was determined by the Co., Ltd., a sectional owner with the largest share of the instant building, and the instant building was used as D shopping mall from April 26, 2008, but its business was poor, and the Defendant’s E-sale was promoted with his/her wording. < Amended by Act No. 9870, Dec. 2, 2009>