For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court determined guilty of the facts charged of this case and rejected Defendant’s mental and physical argument.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of indecent act by compulsion, or mental and physical disorder

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.