A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment has become final.

1. At around 05:40 on July 17, 2015, the Defendants got on a taxi operated by the taxi engineer C at the front of the front of the 305 taxi station located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, but the taxi rate of 18,700 won was excessive and the Defendants did not pay the fare, and the circumstances leading up to the Seoul Nowon-gu Police Station, the victims dispatched after receiving the report from the above C and the slope E would pay the above fare to the Defendants, and the remaining Defendants, who are dissatisfied with this, conspired the victims in collusion with the above C and the 20 citizens, thereby openly insulting the victims.

2. The Defendants engaged in the performance of official duties were requested to present identification cards from D and slope E who were dispatched to the said place upon receiving a report of taxi engineer C at the time and place set forth in Paragraph (1) above. They conspired with each other with their dissatisfactions and expressed their opinions, and Defendant B continued to receive the chest of the above E at her head, and Defendant A got the chest of the above E at her head, and Defendant A was sealed by her hand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit violence against police officers, thereby obstructing the receipt of 112 reports by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to C, D, and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Probation and community service order Defendants: The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendations].