A and Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won, Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 15,00,000 won, and Defendant D.

1. A person who intends to operate an international marriage brokerage business for Defendant C shall register his/her brokerage office with a competent authority in a region where he/she wishes to establish a brokerage office in compliance with the standards prescribed by statutes, such as completion of relevant education and requirements

Nevertheless, around August 2012, the Defendant was unable to run the international marriage brokerage business due to the grounds for disqualification pursuant to the record of the violation of the Immigration Control Act at the time of the entry into and departure from Korea, and was working in the same marriage brokerage center in the past, and was aware of each other, and was willing to run the international marriage brokerage business by lending only the name of the instant company from A, the representative of the International Marriage Brokerage Co., Ltd. B (hereinafter “instant company”) to run the international marriage brokerage business.

The Defendant, in form, registered D as the Defendant’s employee at Jeju Branch of the instant company, and operated an international marriage brokerage business without registration by entering into an international marriage brokerage contract using the name of G, H, and the name of the instant company from around August 26, 2013, by directly managing the entire business, such as concluding and implementing contracts, and managing business, such as arranging the contact between the said men and Vietnam women, and managing business profits.

Since October 14, 2015, the registration of the international marriage brokerage for Jeju Island of the instant company was revoked on March 27, 2014.

Nevertheless, around June 7, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested the Defendant to engage in international marriage brokerage; (b) performed good offices, such as arranging the Defendant to offer P, Q, and introduction, which is a woman of Vietnam’s nationality; and (c) received a total of KRW 7 million from the said L; and (d) received delivery of KRW 15,500,000,000 from the said M.

Accordingly, the Defendant run an international marriage brokerage business without registering from August 2012 to June 7, 2014.

2. Defendant D’s children are children of the above C, as described in paragraph 1 (hereinafter “Defendant D”).