At around 00:12 on November 9, 2013, the Defendant, at the point of “C” located in Northern-gu, Northern-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Selection of Punishment Act are as follows: (a) Defendant shall be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor considering the following: (b) Defendant is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor in consideration of the fact that he/she has damaged goods while being examined by the police box, refused to take a drinking test and threatened police officers who again performed public duties despite his/her past record of punishment; and (c) Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of probation; (b) Defendant has led to the instant crime during the period of probation; (c) Defendant is led to the confession and reflect of the crime; and (d) Defendant has led to the confession and reflect of the crime;