2. The crime of this case is recognized that the Defendant forged and uses private documents under the name of C in relation to rights and obligations four times, the Defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, and the Defendant transferred or repaid obligations arising out of the forged documents of this case to C.

However, even though the Defendant had been punished for the same crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime at another time during the period of repeated crime; the instant crime is a crime that damages the authenticity of documents, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime in light of the method of crime, etc.; the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence after the instant crime, it cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.