However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 26, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 16:40 on January 26, 2020, placed in the shopping bag B department store C department store in Busan, Busan, the 4th floor “D” class store; (b) a paper that had a 340,000 won male-type type-type-type type-type type-type-type type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A E-document;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as to attaching photographs of damaged articles);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 329 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order;

1. Scope of the recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria (the scope of the recommended sentences and the scope of the recommended sentences): Imprisonment for April to October;

2. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, suspended execution for two years (the period of punishment imposed several times on the defendant was previously imposed on the same person, and the quality of the crime is not that of theft by cutting down stacks located in the department store. On the other hand, the defendant appears to repeat the larceny due to shock disorder, etc., and the defendant is expected to receive mental treatment. In addition, the defendant, against the crime of this case, agreed with the victim as well as the victim smoothly after the victim’s change of damage. In addition, in light of the defendant’s age, character and behavior, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as set forth in the text of this case shall be determined by taking into account the various factors of the sentencing conditions indicated