폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the relationship between the Defendant and the victim B, who was unemployed, and around December 15:10, 2013, when drinking in Yansan-gu C located in Yansan-gu Seoul on December 9, 2013, on the ground that the victim said that “the Defendant was frightening” and she was frighted on the bridge and she was frighted on the bridge and she was frightened on seven occasions in the face part of the fright of drinking and she was frightened five times in the face of drinking.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement submitted by the victim on January 28, 2014, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intent not to punish the defendant after the date of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.