손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.
2. The defendant.
1. Basic facts
A. From around 2004, the Plaintiff became aware of the Defendant, who was a student, by putting small or large sized sized sized Ra in Madern City C.
On April 15, 2008, the Plaintiff started dance in the D D D D D D D D D D D-si. The Defendant was also showing a dance from around 2009.
B. From July 17, 2012 to July 26, 2012, the Defendant committed defamation and insult as shown in attached Table 1 against the Plaintiff on seven occasions. Accordingly, on March 29, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 in the Jeonju District Court’s Support.
C. The Defendant’s end of March 2013 and the same year
4. On October 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,500,000 for a fine of KRW 2,00 on June 3, 2014 in the Jeonju District Court’s branch court, which issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,00,00 in the attached Form 2. As a result of the Defendant’s request for formal trial, the Defendant was under criminal trial for the Jeonju District Court’s regular branch court’s regular branch court’s regular branch court’s regular branch court’s regular branch court’s regular branch court’s regular branch court.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 22 evidence (including branch numbers in case of additional number) and purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion from around 2009, the Defendant habitually committed an act, such as blring or damaging character against the Plaintiff. As a result, symptoms, such as depression and hepatitis, etc., were generated to the Plaintiff.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 2,00,000 and the amount of KRW 50,000,000 in total, and the amount of KRW 52,00,000 in total, and damages for delay.
B. First of all, determination on the portion of the medical expenses for judgment 1; the Defendant’s defamation and insult against the Plaintiff seven times from July 17, 2012 to July 26, 2012; and the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment on March 29, 2013; and the end of March 2013 thereafter.
4. At around September, 200, insult the Plaintiff on two occasions.