However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 25, 2018, the Defendant, around 22:10 on February 25, 2018, found the victim C’s D restaurant in Daegu-gun, Daegu-gun, ordered food by seeking food. The Defendant, who was able to take a big interest for the victim that materials were left away and that the business was terminated, did not take the victim’s interest, and took the victim’s desire for other customers in the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force over about 10 minutes.

On August 9, 2018, the Defendant: “F” house located in Daegu-gun E around 02:00 on August 9, 2018; “F” house in the Daegu-gun-gun E; and “F” house in the above head of the relevant head of the relevant head of the relevant office, who is a customer (26 years old) and the victim H (25 years old) were able to see the Defendant, thereby going back to the said head of the relevant head of the relevant office.

The Defendant: (a) the victims prevented himself; (b) caused the victims by cutting the neck of the victim G with the left hand; (c) committed assault on the left inside part of the floor with the hand hand by breaking the head debt by the hand; and (d) assaulted on the hand floor of the victim H on a single occasion.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 737"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement protocol 2018 Senior 2342;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on closure photographs;

1. Article 314(1) and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation is that the defendant has already been subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime in spite of the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case under the influence of alcohol, the victims did not receive a letter of suspicion, the defendant's time of committing each of the crimes of this case, the victim of the obstruction of duties does not want the punishment of the defendant, and other various circumstances shown in the arguments of