On June 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had not deleted the apartment management rules favorable to the residents of the victim D, or purchased the vehicles of Nonparty E, a resident, before Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si; (b) had no rules favorable to the residents by consulting with the management office; (c) had been deprived of the rules favorable to the residents; and (d) had damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

The reason for dismissing the public prosecution of this case is that the public prosecution of this case shall not be instituted against the clearly expressed will of the victim under Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act for the crime provided in Article 307 (2)

The victim withdrawn his wish to punish the defendant on June 2, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.