beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.09.20 2019고단640

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B PPGTS car.

At around 02:31 January 31, 2019, the Defendant, at the speed of 111km from the northwest-gu, west-gu, west-gu, west-gu, D Bank C, at the speed of 111km each hour from the direction of the E hospital to the F High School.

At the time, there are nights, and there is a red extinguishing signal at that time, and there is an intersection where the passage of other vehicles is frequent, and the restricted speed is 40 km per hour. In such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to temporarily stop on the intersection at the time of entrance to the intersection, to live well in the future, to take care of the traffic of other vehicles, to ensure that the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not discover the H rocketing taxi of the victim G (Nam, 62 years old) who was proceeding the said intersection from the direction of the Ministry of Labor to Samsung, due to the negligence of running the speed exceeding 71 km per hour, and did not discover the said intersection, and received the part adjacent to the right part of the Defendant’s Park GTTS car in front of the instant taxi.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim G, such as inside the left-hand part of the entrance, brush, etc. requiring treatment for about six weeks, injury to the victim I (the victim I (the 28 years old), who is the above taxi passenger), such as string the left-hand side requiring treatment for about two weeks, and injury to the victim J (the son, the 23 years old), who is the defendant's son, requiring treatment for about six weeks, such as the mouths, closure, etc. of the brush part of the brush part of the brush, which

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of K and I;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Answers on results of traffic accident analysis;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act.