A. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. There is no significant change in circumstances that may consider the sentencing of the defendant after the judgment of the court below.

Defendant has been punished several times due to the crime of fraud, such as punishment, suspension of execution, etc., and committed fraud during the period of repeated crime.

Upon the commencement of the investigation of this case, the investigation of this case also escaped for a long time.

On the other hand, most of the crimes are the victims' acquisition of money under the pretext of introducing and managing female employees to the operators of entertainment centers.

In addition, considering the overall circumstances asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is heavy or unreasonable, even if it is deemed that the circumstances alleged by the Defendant and the Prosecutor are deemed unreasonable.

Therefore, we cannot accept the argument that the sentencing of the defendant and the prosecutor is unfair.

3. If so, all appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.