If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Around 00:45 on November 4, 2012, the Defendant was asked about the Defendant’s personal information from the police officer F (30 years of age) belonging to the said global group, who was asked about the fact that the Defendant was assaulted to D without paying the taxi expenses while boarding the cab operated by the Defendant, at the Seogu Seo-gu Seoul District Police Station, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, on the 2012. In response to the Defendant’s desire, the Defendant expressed to “Choe, v. Mae, v. Ma, Ma, and Democratic society such as bit Ma, Map, Ma, and Man, Man, Man, Man.” In response to the Defendant’s desire, the Defendant took the f’s head of F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s fent and f’s f’s f’s f’s f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officer F, who deals with the reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of investigation reports (the closure of a global CCTV site and the transmission of CDs)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;