[criminal power] On November 28, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Pyeongtaek Housing Site Board, which was in the horizontal Housing Site Board, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 2, 2014. On January 27, 2014, the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 27, 2014, by having been sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Jung-gu District Court, which became final and conclusive on January 27, 2014. On April 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Suwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on May 8,

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant, C, D, and E, who participated in the selection of the operator of the childcare center in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government F apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”), and G is the president of the prospective occupants’ association of the instant apartment, and H is the head of the management office of the instant apartment under the control of the I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”), the entrusted management company of the apartment, and the J is the person selected as the operator of the childcare center of the instant apartment.

Defendant C, D, E, G, H, and J have the right to select and manage facilities in the apartment including a childcare center, etc. until the council of occupants' representatives is formed and management methods of the apartment of this case are determined in accordance with the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, such as the Housing Act, with respect to the selection of the operator of the apartment of this case, until the council of occupants' representatives is established and managed, and the council of prospective occupants' representatives can participate in the selection of the operator of the childcare center through substantial influence that the association of prospective occupants' representatives can be involved in the selection of the operator of the childcare center, etc., by requesting the selection of the head of the childcare center in the form of a formal bidding procedure. G raised funds by receiving money from the successful bidder of the right to operate the apartment of this case and by dividing the persons who participated in the selection process

D is ordered by G to identify the head, etc. of the operation of the instant apartment childcare center, and ordered E and C to interfere with the operation of the childcare center, and the head of the childcare center in sequence.