요양불승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. From September 4, 2013, the Plaintiff served as an employee in charge of the processing process of the LROM Panel in Bangladesh Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”).
B. On April 16, 2014, the Plaintiff was used in a toilet during the preparation for work at work around 07:20, and was sent back to the old-Sacheon National Hospital, and the hospital was diagnosed as “pathosomes blood due to electric traffic East and beer,” and the hospital was diagnosed as “pathosomes due to the connection with electric traffic” (hereinafter “the instant wound”).
C. On June 17, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the outbreak of the instant injury constitutes an occupational accident, and filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on June 17, 2014, but on August 25, 2014, the Defendant issued a medical care non-approval disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that “the proximate causal relation between the instant injury branches is not recognized” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1, 3, 5, 6, Eul's 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion that the disease of this case occurred since he was employed by the non-party company for about 11 hours per day, work on holidays, and work on the night school, which led to accumulation of skin and stress so that the previous disease, such as high blood pressure, has deteriorated rapidly above nature of nature. The non-party company knew that the plaintiff's high blood pressure symptoms were known and did not properly pay due care and manage it, but did not allow the non-party company to perform excessive work in the working environment where the harmful chemical is continuously exposed, so the disease of this case must be recognized as an occupational accident.
B. Fact-finding 1) The Plaintiff’s business content non-party company is a company processing L CDs, OLD display panel, etc., and the Plaintiff performed the Plaintiff’s business in the process of DNA display display operations after entry on September 4, 2013. The Plaintiff’s specific duties are as follows: the Plaintiff’s specific duties are as follows: the Plaintiff’s inspection and operation (one time a day during the start-up of business).