beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.06.11 2020구단10176

불기소사건기록열람등사불허가처분취소

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. We examine this safety ex officio.

In a case where the infringement of interest is terminated after a lawsuit disputing the illegality of the original administrative disposition was filed (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Nu2685, Feb. 23, 1996). While the lawsuit seeking revocation of the disclosure of information of this case was pending, the fact that the defendant provided the plaintiff with the information stated in the purport of the claim (the copy of the record list) to the plaintiff is no dispute between the parties. As such, the plaintiff has no interest in the lawsuit to dispute the illegality of the disposition rejecting the disclosure of information of this case, and the lawsuit of this case

2. As such, the instant lawsuit is unlawful and thus dismissed, and the costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendant pursuant to Article 32 of the Administrative Litigation Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.