손해배상(기)
1. The part of the instant lawsuit’s claim for a correction of the satisfaction shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiffs' remaining claims against the defendants.
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff A, F, M, and N are children of the network T, while the plaintiffO is the wife of the network T.
Plaintiff
B’s wife, Plaintiff C, D, and E are Plaintiff A’s children, and Plaintiff G are Plaintiff F’s wife, Plaintiff H, I, J, K, K, and Plaintiff F’s children.
B. Defendant P’s clan (hereinafter “Defendant P”) is a clan consisting of descendants of U.S. 27 years old who set up a common ancestor, and Defendant Qu, R, and S are compilation members of the P newsletter newly published by Defendant P around December 2010 (hereinafter “instant family clan”).
C. Of the instant supplementary table, the phrase “30 years of age” is written as “self-W,” and the phrase “31 years of age” is written as indicated in attached Form 1 to the effect that “WW’s subsequent loss shall be null and void.”
In addition, the “complication” in Section 743 to 745 of the instant family table “I” was replaced by “IX after the original author X managed the mountain site of V,” and the Plaintiff A and F, which is its children, have argued that I and F, as the descendants of the Defendant clan, they were recorded as V’s descendants in the Yebook published in 1976. However, T, Plaintiff A and F did not have any Y, but the fact that T, Plaintiff A and F did not have any Y any son other than the YI, and T, it is not confirmed that T, children of T, and children of T, the most reliable funeral (17 years) stated “IA’s descendants after W,” and thus, it is written in paragraph 2(d) of the attached list to the effect that “I cannot be recognized as the descendants of Plaintiff A and F as those of V.”
Plaintiff
A filed a lawsuit against the defendant clan against the defendant in Seoul Southern District Court 201Gahap8073, the Seoul Southern District Court 2011. The above court accepted the claim for confirmation of the status of a member of the clan on November 4, 2011, and rendered a judgment that dismissed the claim for consolation money. On August 16, 2012, the appeal filed by the plaintiff A and the defendant clan all dismissed (Seoul High Court 201Na95467), and December 12, 2012.