However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 20, 2016, the Defendant was crossing the road in front of D, which is located in the Gu in Ansan-gu, at the time of Ansan-si on May 20, 2016. During the patrol, the Defendant discovered the nearby slope F, etc. of the police station E box belonging to the police station during the safe patrol and demanded the Defendant to sign and seal the PDA short-term and to notify the Defendant.

The Defendant, “I do not see why she is wurd?”

(b) in this section.

“To leave the site” while stating that “I wish to leave the site,” and the above slope F is signed and required to do so.

“” and the Defendant, who prevents the Defendant from selling, francing the above F’s arms by drinking, and then, whether “the franchise, franchise, franchise,” franchise.

Han Doz. Doz.

“F was pushed down with her hand the chest.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officials on illegal crossing and the imposition of notice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F, G, and H;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (see, e.g., the confession of the crime of this case by the defendant, the health status of the defendant is not good, and the fact that the defendant is the first offender);