2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport.

A. On March 11, 2010, the Plaintiff, at the first floor of the Employment Support Center for the Daegu Northern Branch, became a dispute over the monopoly use of the Defendant-only computer for public use.

B. At around 18:10 on the same day, the Defendant inflicted injury on the Plaintiff, including the right shoulder, the right sprink, and the sprinke, which require approximately three weeks of treatment on the front side of the D building located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, by putting the Plaintiff sprinking the upper right shoulder.

(hereinafter “the instant injury”). C.

On April 22, 2010, in relation to the instant injury, the Defendant was subject to a decision of suspension of indictment at the Seo-gu District Prosecutors' Office.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above fact of finding the liability for damages, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages incurred by the injury of this case.

B. 1) Medical expenses: (a) the Plaintiff’s additional medical expenses of KRW 189,500 are recognized to have been paid the sum of KRW 189,500 for the medical expenses from March 12, 2010 to April 2, 2010 due to the instant injury. In addition to the medical expenses of KRW 189,500 for the instant injury, the Plaintiff asserts that the total of KRW 13,397,800 for the medical expenses (i.e., KRW 17,587,300-189,500 for 4,00,000 for the 189,50 won for the instant injury, taking into account the developments leading up to the instant injury, the degree of the injury, etc., the Plaintiff’s additional medical expenses claimed by the Plaintiff are difficult to recognize the causal relation between the Plaintiff’s injury and the injury, such as stress and stress on April 2, 2010 after the treatment period of the said injury.