성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.
Punishment of the crime
On January 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) leased Btel 912 and 1112 and operated it as “C”; (b) used commercial sex acts under the condition that the Defendant would pay 8-90,000 won out of the price for commercial sex acts; and (c) provided the said condition that the Defendant would pay 8-90,000 won out of the price for commercial sex acts; and (d) provided the said 140,000 won to the male customer E, and provided the said 912 headtel, and provided the said 9.12 head, who provided the said 1.40,000 won for commercial sex acts.
In addition, the Defendant engaged in commercial sex acts, such as arranging sexual traffic, by having a female engage in commercial sex acts, in return for the payment of sexual traffic from many unspecified male customers who were found in the said commercial sex acts from November 2014 to January 18:00, 2015.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each written statement prepared D and E;
1. On-site photographs;
1. Report on investigation (report on calculation of profits from sexual traffic) and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports (additional imposition);
1. Article 19 (1) 1 (the occupation of arranging sexual traffic) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of a fine concerning facts constituting an offense and the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;
1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;
1. It shall be sentenced as ordered in consideration of the circumstances, such as the fact that no profit is high due to the business of sentencing in Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but it appears that the first offender, the fact that it appears not to operate after being discovered, and the fact that it does not repeat a crime.